Update Identifier Discovery

[OR13]

convert markdown to respec.

[mkhraisha]

Comment about VC-JWT.

everything else looks great

[mprorock]

This looks great

[OR13]

I just copied the text already in the discovery md file... JWK keys can be used to verify both detached JWS and JWTs. (Most LD proofs use detached JWS).

…

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022, 7:24 AM Mahmoud Alkhraishi ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In docs/sections/use-case-requirements.html <#258 (comment)> : > +</section> + + <p> + The <code>didDocument</code> MAY contain a <code>verificationMethod</code> section, + which MAY be used to support <code>did:web</code> based verification relationships. + </p> +<p> + The <code>didDocument</code> MUST NOT contain <code>verificationMethods</code> where the controller is different from the DID Subject. +</p> + +<p> + All <code>Ed25519VerificationKey2018</code> types support <code>Ed25519Siganture2018</code>. +</p> + +<p> + All <code>JsonWebKey2020</code> types support <code>JsonWebSignature2020</code> AND <code>VC-JWT</code>. do we need to have AND here? aren't most implementations of JWS2020 LD-Proof based rather than JWT based? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#258 (review)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB7JLMELVIRZ3JXPFI6P2HTVRLVGNANCNFSM5Z7UVIDA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[mkhraisha]

I missed that sentence when we inserted the discovery document then.

I'll go ahead and remove my CR