Editorial: Updates to process (draft) #2088
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@spectranaut is this ready for review? |
pkra
added
the
editorial
|
Hmm I guess not. I'm going to want to make a second pass of edits now that we have the monorepo. |
|
superseded by: #2248 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #2055
We discussed moving towards a monorepo, with all specs in one repository, as a potential way to make it easy for implementers to implement from PRs instead of implementing from the editors spec.
I reviewed the process document once again, trying to match what we have been doing this last year, and create an interim process until we have a mono repo (or some other process).