Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gen2 feature: Data model #310

Closed
UlfBj opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Gen2 feature: Data model #310

UlfBj opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
VISS v2 Generation Two of the spec

Comments

@UlfBj
Copy link
Contributor

UlfBj commented Oct 23, 2019

This chapter in the Gen2 CORE document needs to be updated to reflect that the data model to be used is VSS 2.0.

@UlfBj
Copy link
Contributor Author

UlfBj commented Oct 23, 2019

I assign myself to the task of updating this chapter.

@UlfBj UlfBj added the VISS v2 Generation Two of the spec label Oct 24, 2019
@PatrickCQ
Copy link
Contributor

Is it agreed by the automotive group that only VSS 2.0 is a valid datamodel for Gen2?

@UlfBj
Copy link
Contributor Author

UlfBj commented Oct 30, 2019

To my understanding the WG has decided that VSS 2.0 is the data model to use in Gen2.

@tguild
Copy link
Member

tguild commented Dec 3, 2019

this is partially resolved in #311 and 7f3ddfb but still some single tree leaning of #315 although softened with should instead of shall.

@UlfBj Ulf suggested on WG call being able to support both and leave to implementation to decide if it wants to add as a branch or link to external service.

https://www.w3.org/2019/12/03-auto-minutes

I think we should focus on service registry as likely to influence this and suggest that as topic for next call and here in this issue.

@tguild tguild closed this as completed May 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
VISS v2 Generation Two of the spec
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants