Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow unicode in baggage keys by referencing XML #120

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dyladan
Copy link
Member

@dyladan dyladan commented May 9, 2023

Alternative to #117 which relies on an external definition for keys


Preview | Diff

@dyladan dyladan force-pushed the unicode-keys-external-def branch 3 times, most recently from 04aa2b3 to 2455c92 Compare May 9, 2023 18:36
@dyladan
Copy link
Member Author

dyladan commented May 9, 2023

@plehegar any idea why the preview is broken for this PR? Build works fine locally

@basti1302 basti1302 marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2023 19:29
@@ -45,7 +42,8 @@ Producers SHOULD try to produce a `baggage-string` without any `list-member`s wh

#### key

A `token` which identifies a `value` in the `baggage`. `token` is defined in [RFC7230, Section 3.2.6](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3.2.6).
A `key` which identifies a `value` in the `baggage`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This sentence feels a bit ambiguous (key identifying a value) and is also not complete; instead, can we remove this sentence and instead add to the definitions list something like:

key = token ; as defined in Name in [[XML]]

and then in the ####key section maybe we can have:

token is defined as Name in [[XML]], Section 2.3: https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#NT-Name.

@kalyanaj
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this as this is no longer applicable per recent WG decision.

@kalyanaj kalyanaj closed this Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants