Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[css-text-3] tiny editorial issue in § 4.1 The White Space Processing Rules #4810

Closed
TalbotG opened this issue Feb 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels

Comments

@TalbotG
Copy link
Collaborator

TalbotG commented Feb 27, 2020

In the first Note starting § 4.1. The White Space Processing Rules , also found in the Editor Draft
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/#white-space-rules
, there seems to be a tiny editorial mistake:

"The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) and that considered syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical."

I think the sentence should be instead:

"The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) and that considers syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical."

Otherwise, the sentence seems awkward or confusing.

Or maybe (seems even better now that I read it) the sentence should be rather (without "that"):

"The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) and considered syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical."

@TalbotG TalbotG changed the title [css-text-3] tiny editorial issue in § 4.1. The White Space Processing Rules [css-text-3] tiny editorial issue in § 4.1 The White Space Processing Rules Feb 27, 2020
@fantasai fantasai added the css-text-3 Current Work label Mar 3, 2020
@fantasai
Copy link
Collaborator

fantasai commented Mar 3, 2020

Fixed as "and those considered syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax)". Thanks for the report!

@fantasai fantasai closed this as completed Mar 3, 2020
@frivoal frivoal added the Testing Unnecessary Memory aid - issue doesn't require tests label Apr 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants