You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Criteria 36 got rewritten in PR #38, which adds a nice distinction, but loses the point of the original, which was addressing how the desire for actual deletion is addressed, not just the regulatory compliance.
<section><h5>Question</h5><p>
How are mistakes corrected, and how is the right to be forgotten
addressed? (Note how this creates a tension with immutability,
which may be valuable in 2.7.1 and elsewhere.)
</p></section><section><h5>Responses</h5><oltype="A"><li>
Provable deletion of data is fully supported. Once something is
deleted, nothing internal to the system allows it to be recovered.
</li><li>
True, provable deletion is not supported, but deleted data can be
suppressed in jurisdictions where this is required.
</li><li>
The VDR is a permanent, immutable record with no support for deletion of any kind.
</li></ol></section><section><h5>Relevance</h5><p>
?
</p></section>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Criteria 36 got rewritten in PR #38, which adds a nice distinction, but loses the point of the original, which was addressing how the desire for actual deletion is addressed, not just the regulatory compliance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: