-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support an indication of sharebility status #1432
Comments
Thanks for sharing this use case, @garfi303 . Currently, DCAT makes use of For the discussion underlying this approach, see https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+label%3Adct%3AaccessRights Could you review the above, and indicate how DCAT should be possibly revised to address your requirements? E.g., what is needed is just a specific code list? |
|
@simsong In what way does |
The issue is that there are two different kinds of information that we want to represent. One with whom the dataset may be shared, the second is whether or not the dataset is ready to be shared. My understanding is that when you have two different kinds of information, it's better to represent them in two different kinds of elements, rather than combining them into one. Is that not the case here? |
If you have very specific needs, then you may need to specify a 'profile' of DCAT for your community. |
We intend to do that if there is no interest in adding this level of description to DCATv3. However, I think that these are things that many organizations need to document, and I believe that it's better to document everything in one place in a consistent, standards-based approach, rather than having different organizations develop their own approaches. |
Would dct:available help for "Expected to be sharable by..."? It is defined as: "Date that the resource became or will become available." It can take a future date. The others seem to be access rights, as per dct:accessRights, which can have a standard list of values, and of course you can create your own standard list. |
In DCAT-AP there is the property dcatap:availability defined for distributions. Having now as just published controlled vocabulary https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/concept-scheme/-/resource?uri=http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/planned-availability W.r.t. accessRights, the DCAT profile for Flanders has identified that there is a difference between the accessrights to the dataset versus the accessRights to the service providing access to the data. Observe that these are different interpretations of access per kind of resource: The first is bound to inherit legal basis, while the second is more about the measures taken to make the service operational. |
@simsong , unless you have any additional comments, we will consider this issue as closed. |
Respectfully, this is not about accessRights. The issue is not whether the data is open or restricted. The issue is not classification level. The issue is not how the data is being made available over the internet (accessURL/downloadURL). The issue is not if the data is available or not. The issue is whether the file, stored on a disk, is encrypted with AES-128 or AES-256. This is a very specific technical issue that is involved with the transition from current encryption algorithms to quantum-resistant algorithms. It is of broad interest to any organization that stores data encrypted. It may be covered under the current taxonomy, but it does not seem to be covered by the ones you cite above. |
After some discussion in tonight call, we decided we move this issue for the next standardization round. See resolution https://www.w3.org/2023/01/24-dxwgdcat-minutes.html#r03 |
Project/Milestone modified. Explanation: As DCAT v3 moves through review and hopefully ratification, we want to make sure that open issues and feedback that have yet to be completely addressed are properly recorded and tagged/assigned in github to both clarify their status and to help review and prioritise as a source of improvements and new requirements in future DCAT versions |
Sharebility status
Status: open
Identifier:
Creator: @garfi303 (Simson Garfinkel)
Deliverable(s): DCATv3
Stakeholders
Users of DCAT within large organization.
Problem statement
We are using DCAT for representing our internal organization data catalog. Some users have data that is not sharable but needs to be indicated in the catalog Others have data that is not ready for sharing but will be sharable one day. So we would like to have a DCATv3 field that indicates the Sharability status, and this could include:
I'm not sure how to represent this and don't think that it can be represented at the moment.
Existing approaches
DCAT-US has a field called
accessLevel
that must bepublic
,restricted public
, ornon-public
, but this is not sufficiently rich.Links
n/a
Requirements
We have a mandatory requirement for this, so we will either use what DCATv3 does, or we will develop our own.
Related use cases
''Optional references to related local (refer to anchor identifier [[#Id...]]) and remote use cases (e.g. POE-WG UCs)''.
Comments
''Optional section for editorial comments, suggestion and their interactive resolution''
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: