Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identifier type [RIDT] #68

Closed
jpullmann opened this issue Jan 18, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

Identifier type [RIDT] #68

jpullmann opened this issue Jan 18, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@jpullmann
Copy link

Identifier type [RIDT]

Indicate type of identifier (e.g.prism:doi, bibo:doi, ISBNetc.).


Related use cases: Modeling identifiers and making them actionable [ID11] 
@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

This is strictly related to #53.

@agbeltran
Copy link
Member

In DATS, we included an identifierSource associated with the identifier to report this information (see https://github.com/biocaddie/WG3-MetadataSpecifications/blob/master/json-schemas/identifier_info_schema.json)

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

In DATS, we included an identifierSource associated with the identifier to report this information (see https://github.com/biocaddie/WG3-MetadataSpecifications/blob/master/json-schemas/identifier_info_schema.json)

Thanks, @agbeltran . ADMS does something similar, but, following UN/CEFACT it distinguishes between identifier scheme, identifier scheme version, and the agency responsible for the identifier scheme - see:

https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-adms/#identifier

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Contributor

See #53 (comment)

@agbeltran
Copy link
Member

agbeltran commented Oct 25, 2018

DataCite specifies a set of identifiers types in this XSD: https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/include/datacite-relatedIdentifierType-v4.xsd

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah - DataCite hide a lot of useful stuff inside XSDs. Shame they aren't even tabulated somewhere!

@agbeltran agbeltran added the due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days label Dec 19, 2018
@agbeltran
Copy link
Member

Closing after merging #614

DCAT revision automation moved this from In progress to Done Dec 19, 2018
@davebrowning davebrowning removed the due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days label Feb 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
DCAT revision
  
Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants