We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
skos:changeNote
For the change notes where we say things like:
skos:changeNote "Property added in this context in this revision of DCAT"@en ;
I think it would be better to say
skos:changeNote "Property added in this context in DCAT 2.0"@en ;
now that we know the version number.
This will make these notes future proof, in case there are new DCAT versions in the future.
I would also change in same way the text in the specification to match the text in the RDF file, even if in the spec is less of an issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@agbeltran
I think it would be better to say skos:changeNote "Property added in this context in DCAT 2.0"@en ;
I agree I think it is important to change it!
Sorry, something went wrong.
This seems related to #923
Merge pull request #997 from w3c/dcat-issue984-riccardo
d7794fe
Addressing #984: inserted DCAT 2.0 in English, Italian and Spanish change notes, and some Czech fixes
No branches or pull requests
For the change notes where we say things like:
skos:changeNote "Property added in this context in this revision of DCAT"@en ;
I think it would be better to say
skos:changeNote "Property added in this context in DCAT 2.0"@en ;
now that we know the version number.
This will make these notes future proof, in case there are new DCAT versions in the future.
I would also change in same way the text in the specification to match the text in the RDF file, even if in the spec is less of an issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: