Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementing proposals to address #83 & #85 #807

Merged

Conversation

andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

@andrea-perego andrea-perego commented Mar 7, 2019

See:

Preview here (BTW, rawgit is now down):

@andrea-perego andrea-perego added this to To do in DCAT revision via automation Mar 7, 2019
@andrea-perego andrea-perego changed the title Implementing proposal 1 to address #85 Implementing proposals to address #83 & #85 Mar 7, 2019
This was referenced Mar 7, 2019
@davebrowning
Copy link
Contributor

I've moved this back into DCAT CR in the hope we can incorporate it in the CR. If review indicates we need a longer discussion then we can defer it to Future work again.

@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair self-assigned this Apr 24, 2019
@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Contributor

dr-shorthair commented May 7, 2019

Considering the resulting "size" of the part concerning the examples for temporal and spatial coverage, it may be more appropriate to move all this stuff to a separate section - consistently with what done of identifiers, etc.

I've done this, and also consolidated some other temporal examples into new (informative) section https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/andrea-perego-dcat-rev-temporal-spatial-coverage/dcat/index.html#time-and-space

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is good to go now. Since these are substantive changes, they need approval by DCAT team.

- Editorial fixes everywhere
- Started harmonising Turtle notation in examples and fixed some syntax errors
- Started harmonising use of whitespace and indentation in Turtle examples
- Replaced rdfs:comment in example with dct:title or dct:description (as appropriate)
- Added pointer to Example 3 in Section 11.2 as an example of the use of dcat:spatialResolutionInMeters

- Validated HTML markup
@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dr-shorthair said:

I think this is good to go now. Since these are substantive changes, they need approval by DCAT team.

+1 from me.

I just added some additional editorial changes, and validated HTML markup - see commit d10f88e

@davebrowning
Copy link
Contributor

davebrowning commented May 7, 2019

Sterling work guys

One minor thing: there is still an issue NOTE to #85.

More importantly, I get a http 403 for the Europa.eu link at line 3057? @andrea-perego can you suggest something more public?

Apart from that it looks good to me

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davebrowning said:

More importantly, I get a http 403 for the Europa.eu link at line 3057?

Thanks for pointing this out. I think it is a temporary issue, but I will check.

@davebrowning
Copy link
Contributor

@andrea-perego said:

Thanks for pointing this out. I think it is a temporary issue, but I will check.

Yes, just realised I get the same error from gh-pages...

- Added entries for classes on spatial and temporal coverage, and the new section "Time and space"
- Started harmonising changelog
@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davebrowning said:

One minor thing: there is still an issue NOTE to #85.

Thanks, and I also now realise we have not updated the changelog.

I just made a commit commenting the issue NOTE, and updating the changelog (2d8422d)

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Contributor

We should also copy all the code fragments/examples into ttl files in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/gh-pages/dcat/examples

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dr-shorthair said:

We should also copy all the code fragments/examples into ttl files in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/gh-pages/dcat/examples

I will take care of that.

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

BTW, are you all happy with the current geometry examples - build upon the SDW BP ones?

If yes, I will delete the .png files with the map previews of the original examples.

@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

BTW, are you all happy with the current geometry examples - build upon the SDW BP ones?

Yes, I like the section "Time and space". I wonder if we should add the support on representing time and space coverage in the "items" listed in the "Status of This Document".

If yes, I will delete the .png files with the map previews of the original examples.

In my very modest opinion, the .png files do not make any harm, they might help people not familiar with the concepts such as centroid, BB, etc. Anyway if you think otherwise, I do not object to deleting them

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

andrea-perego commented May 7, 2019

@riccardoAlbertoni said:

If yes, I will delete the .png files with the map previews of the original examples.

In my very modest opinion, the .png files do not make any harm, they might help people not familiar with the concepts such as centroid, BB, etc. Anyway if you think otherwise, I do not object to deleting them

Just for clarity: the .png files of the current examples will be kept. But we have still the .png files of the old examples, and they are not used any longer. These are the ones I was considering to delete, provided that we don't want to switch back to the original examples.

@davebrowning
Copy link
Contributor

What's used in the document works for me. Probably less confusing to delete the unused ones, but I don't feel strongly about it.

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

andrea-perego commented May 7, 2019

It's for keeping folders clean from unused / unnecessary files. I have a back-up copy of everything, anyway.

@davebrowning
Copy link
Contributor

I think we're done here. I'd like to notify this PR (and the underlying issues) in the Plenary agenda for today's meeting as per usual process (to flag up the work), so will merge before then, unless someone shouts. We can handle any issues arising under a separate PR, hopefully just of editorial nature

@davebrowning davebrowning merged commit 2995d15 into gh-pages May 7, 2019
DCAT revision automation moved this from To do to Done May 7, 2019
@davebrowning davebrowning deleted the andrea-perego-dcat-rev-temporal-spatial-coverage branch May 7, 2019 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dcat dct:spatial dct:temporal requires discussion Issue to be discussed in a telecon (group or plenary)
Projects
DCAT revision
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants