Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify note about wcag-only conformance reporting #1815

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 21, 2021

Conversation

mattgarrish
Copy link
Member

This pull request changes the note so it links to the section in WCAG that explains the URL to use for conformance reporting. It also notes that the level cannot be specified in the URL so has to be provided by another means such as the summary.

Fixes #1791

…g on reporting;

add additional note that the conformance level cannot be specified in the url in such cases
@avneeshsingh
Copy link

there is a typo in conformsto. Otherwise it is good.

@mattgarrish
Copy link
Member Author

Ah, right, I fixed that in the other pull request but forgot it was still in this branch. It won't get repaired in the merge so I'll fix it again.

@mattgarrish mattgarrish merged commit 0b63d42 into main Sep 21, 2021
@mattgarrish mattgarrish deleted the editorial/issue-1791 branch September 21, 2021 11:01
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Sep 23, 2021

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2021-09-23

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

4. Normative references to a specification of metadata properties are needed.

See github issue #1799, #1767.

See github pull request #1818, #1815.

Avneesh Singh: These are the reminders, there are some PRs with requests to review

Avneesh Singh: there's some further discussion on zero-tolerance for a11y review, please provide comments
… AOB?

George Kerscher: Asking for comments for these on GH?

Avneesh Singh: The PRs need review, and the last one is an issue, please provide comments on that

George Kerscher: Personally, the approach being taken for discovery seems ok

Avneesh Singh: There's more emails

Charles LaPierre: I was just looking at the editor's note FXL techniques
… diff and preview have errors

Charles LaPierre: Add editor's note mentioning the fxl techniques #1818

Charles LaPierre: #1818

Wendy Reid: It's already merged, so there's no "diff"

John Foliot: matt, FWIW, another emergent spec with a section related to security and privacy. Note that this WG are in ongoing discussions with i18n folks at W3C. See: https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/content/index.html#privacy-and-security-considerations

Matt Garrish: Just look at the file changes

Avneesh Singh: Let's continue discussion on GH
… APA call times will be finalized, and I will send them to the mailing list
… see you all in the 3.3 call tomorrow
… have a nice day!


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

How to identify WCAG A or AA with conformsto
3 participants