You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2019. It is now read-only.
For the figcaption element in the current HTML 5.1 draft it says:
Contexts in which this element can be used:
As a descendant of a figure element.
Elsewhere though the content model of other elements only permits a figcaption as a child of a figure element, and the semantics of figcaption say that
The figcaption element represents a caption or legend for the rest of the contents of the figcaption element’s parent figure element, if any.
So I think that either the contexts in which the figcaption element can be used to say
"As a child of a figure element."
or examples need to give explaining when it is appropriate for the element to be a non-child descendant, and whether the semantics should say
The figcaption element represents a caption or legend for the rest of the contents of the figcaption element’s nearest ancestor figure element, if any.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For the figcaption element in the current HTML 5.1 draft it says:
Elsewhere though the content model of other elements only permits a figcaption as a child of a figure element, and the semantics of figcaption say that
So I think that either the contexts in which the figcaption element can be used to say
"As a child of a figure element."
or examples need to give explaining when it is appropriate for the element to be a non-child descendant, and whether the semantics should say
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: