Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IMSC is not a strict superset of SDP-US #128

Closed
skynavga opened this issue Jan 8, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

IMSC is not a strict superset of SDP-US #128

skynavga opened this issue Jan 8, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@skynavga
Copy link
Contributor

skynavga commented Jan 8, 2016

SDP-US Section 4.2 [1] states:

"R0008 - A document must contain a ttp:profile element where the use attribute of that element is specified as http://www.w3.org/ns/ttml/profile/sdp-us."

however, IMSC Section 6.10 [2] states:

"#profile permitted ... The ttp:profile element shall not be present."

This means that the statement made in the IMSC Abstract and Scope sections regarding SDP-US is incorrect:

"The text-only profile is a strict superset of [ttml10-sdp-us]."

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml10-sdp-us/#Use_of_Constrained_TTML_Feature_content_profile
[2] https://rawgit.com/w3c/imsc1/master/spec/ttml-ww-profiles.html#common-features

@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor

The ttp:profile element was allowed all the way to, and including, CR2 -- possibly in part to support SDP-US. It looks like the prohibition of the ttp:profile element is a bug inadvertently introduced in an effort to simplify profile signaling. PR #129 proposes to revert the change and allow the ttp:profile element to allow SDP-US documents to be processed by IMSC1 processors.

@palemieux palemieux added this to the imsc1-cr3 milestone Jan 14, 2016
palemieux added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2016
Address #128 (Compatibility with SDP-US)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants