Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDP-US document may not adhere to HRM #134

Closed
nigelmegitt opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

SDP-US document may not adhere to HRM #134

nigelmegitt opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor

The statement in the abstract:

The text profile is a superset of [ttml10-sdp-us].

is in fact untrue since it is possible to construct SDP-US documents that fail HRM requirements.

Suggest rewording to:

The text profile is a syntactic superset of [ttml10-sdp-us]; it is feasible to create documents that are simultaneously conformant both to SDP-US and the IMSC Text profile.

or something along those lines.

@skynavga
Copy link
Contributor

suggest closing this as duplicate to #128, and adding the above as a comment

@skynavga skynavga changed the title The text profile is NOT a superset of SDP-US SDP-US document may not adhere to HRM Jan 14, 2016
@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Raising this issue as separate to #128 was the agreed outcome in yesterday's TTWG meeting, and was the action I took. I agree that they are related, however the resolutions can be separated, or alternatively a single pull request can address both simultaneously.

palemieux added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2016
@palemieux palemieux added this to the imsc1-cr3 milestone Jan 18, 2016
@palemieux palemieux self-assigned this Jan 18, 2016
palemieux added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2016
Addresses #134 ("SDP-US document may not adhere to HRM")
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants