Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should itts:fillLineGap be deprecated? #276

Closed
palemieux opened this issue Nov 6, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor

commented Nov 6, 2017

Depends on the outcome of https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/429

@palemieux palemieux added this to the imsc1.1 WD2 milestone Nov 6, 2017

@css-meeting-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Nov 10, 2017

The Working Group just discussed Should itts:fillLineGap be deprecated? #276, and agreed to the following resolutions:

  • RESOLUTION: Remove fillLineGap from TTML2 and retain itts:fillLineGap in IMSC 1.1.
The full IRC log of that discussion <nigel> Topic: Should itts:fillLineGap be deprecated? #276
<nigel> github: https://github.com//issues/276
<nigel> rrsagent, make minutes
<RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2017/11/09-tt-minutes.html nigel
<nigel> atai: My proposal is to do the same as linePadding, to leave it in IMSC 1.1 and take it out
<nigel> .. of TTML2. The rationale is first that we are waiting for a proper solution in HTML and CSS.
<nigel> .. It won't happen before we publish TTML2 so we should keep the established solution.
<nigel> .. From the previous discussion it is unlikely that we will be able to pull it into TTML2,
<nigel> .. or define it in a new namespace, so we should take it out of TTML2 and keep it in IMSC1.1.
<nigel> glenn: Does Netflix plan to use fillLineGap?
<nigel> cyril: We are not using it now but I think we want to use it.
<nigel> glenn: I have no objection to taking it out but we should get a Netflix view.
<nigel> .. There was a question about if it is semantically the same.
<nigel> pal: It was different. We spent a long time getting it right in IMSC 1.1 so we should copy
<nigel> .. it directly.
<nigel> RESOLUTION: Remove fillLineGap from TTML2 and retain itts:fillLineGap in IMSC 1.1.
@nigelmegitt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Nov 24, 2017

Netflix has objected to this Resolution, requesting:

  • Mark itts:fillLineGap as deprecated in IMSC 1.1
  • Add an exactly equivalent style attribute to TTML2 and permit that in IMSC 1.1

@nigelmegitt nigelmegitt reopened this Nov 24, 2017

@palemieux palemieux added agenda and removed blocked labels Dec 6, 2017

@css-meeting-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Jan 9, 2018

The Working Group just discussed Should itts:fillLineGap be deprecated? imsc#276, and agreed to the following resolutions:

  • RESOLUTION: Do not deprecate ittp:fillLineGap (and also remove it from TTML2 until a CSS compatible mechanism is available)
The full IRC log of that discussion <nigel> Topic: Should itts:fillLineGap be deprecated? imsc#276
<nigel> RESOLUTION: Do not deprecate ittp:fillLineGap (and also remove it from TTML2 until a CSS compatible mechanism is available)
<nigel> github: https://github.com//issues/276

@palemieux palemieux removed the agenda label Jan 9, 2018

@nigelmegitt nigelmegitt removed the agenda label Jan 9, 2018

@palemieux palemieux closed this Jan 15, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.