Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address line comments for issue-126 branch made by @nigelmegitt #166

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 10, 2016

Conversation

nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor

  • Change EBU-TT-D encoding statement to remove specific reference to
    UTF-16 and mention EBU-TT-D recommendation for UTF-8.
  • Make EBU-TT-D example validate against EBU-TT-D schema by moving
    tts:lineHeight specification from <body> to "baseStyle" <style>.
  • Fix typo of supplemented
  • Tighten up wording re SMPTE-TT constraints and remove redundant
    bullet.

* Change EBU-TT-D encoding statement to remove specific reference to
UTF-16 and mention EBU-TT-D recommendation for UTF-8.
* Make EBU-TT-D example validate against EBU-TT-D schema by moving
`tts:lineHeight` specification from `<body>` to `"baseStyle" <style>`.
* Fix typo of supplemented
* Tighten up wording re SMPTE-TT constraints and remove redundant
bullet.
@nigelmegitt nigelmegitt changed the title Address line comments made by @nigelmegitt Address line comments for issue-126 branch made by @nigelmegitt Feb 10, 2016
This commit adds the complete example files from the spec, so that they
can be individually loaded and validated. This doesn’t help with
synchronising changes between the HTML document and the examples of
course, so it’s just a handy reference material. Arguably they should
have the .ttml extension since that’s the registered type extension,
but xml is not exactly wrong and is more easily processed by generic
XML processors.
@skynavga
Copy link
Contributor

Make EBU-TT-D example validate against EBU-TT-D schema by moving tts:lineHeight specification from to "baseStyle" <style>.

Are you saying that tts:lineHeight is not normatively permitted on body in EBU-TT-D? Or is this just a case of an inaccurate schema.

@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, #styling-inline is not permitted in EBU-TT-D.

palemieux added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2016
Address line comments for issue-126 branch made by @nigelmegitt
@palemieux palemieux merged commit 26a1d3c into issue-126 Feb 10, 2016
@palemieux palemieux deleted the issue-126-nigel-line-comments branch March 10, 2016 18:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants