Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

removed names #180

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 5, 2016
Merged

removed names #180

merged 2 commits into from
May 5, 2016

Conversation

tmichel07
Copy link
Contributor

removed names from 1st paragraph. Added John in s 2nd paragraph. Added a wording on DECE.

@skynavga
Copy link
Contributor

I would suggest removing "members" (since John's company is not a member), and also eliding affiliations, and simplifying to the following:

The editor wishes to especially acknowledge contributions by Glenn Adams, John Birch, Mike Dolan, Nigel Megitt, Thierry Michel, and Andreas Tai.

@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor

Invited experts are members of the working group, so as long as we're clear that we're talking about WG members not consortium members I don't have a problem with this. Organisational backing is important both in granting individuals the resources to contribute and in distinguishing which employer/organisation was relevant for each individual in case they have a career with various employers.

My preference is to leave the affiliations present.

@skynavga
Copy link
Contributor

Let's take this up at our next call. I prefer the simpler approach, which
is consistent with other acknowledgement sections, e.g., see [1].

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/acknowledgments.html#acknowledgments

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Nigel Megitt notifications@github.com
wrote:

Invited experts are members of the working group, so as long as we're
clear that we're talking about WG members not consortium members I don't
have a problem with this. Organisational backing is important both in
granting individuals the resources to contribute and in distinguishing
which employer/organisation was relevant for each individual in case they
have a career with various employers.

My preference is to leave the affiliations present.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#180 (comment)

@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor

Sure, good idea.

@palemieux palemieux merged commit df13c34 into master May 5, 2016
@palemieux palemieux deleted the tmichel07-patch-2 branch October 6, 2016 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants