Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial improvements to the Amended Rec process text #93

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 19, 2017
Merged

Editorial improvements to the Amended Rec process text #93

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 19, 2017

Conversation

dwsinger
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Improved definition of amended rec, clarify an otherwise, (weakly
requested) move the defining place for amended rec
<dd>Where there is no Working Group chartered to maintain a Recommendation W3C may produce a new
version which W3C publishes as an Amended version of the Recommendation.</dd>
<dd>An <dfn id="rec-amended">Amended Recommendation</dfn> is a Recommendation that is amended to include <a href="#correction-classes">substantive
changes that do not add new features</a>, and is produced by the W3C at a time when the Recommendation does not fit
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would reverse the order of the sub-clauses, along the line sof

... is produced by W3C w/out WG. An Amended Rec must not include new features.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems plausible, draft away, and I'll comment if needed

@plehegar
Copy link
Member

LGTM.

Improved definition of amended rec, clarify an otherwise, (weakly
requested) move the defining place for amended rec
@dwsinger dwsinger merged commit 2f37589 into w3c:gh-pages Sep 19, 2017
@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion DoC This has been referenced from a Disposition of Comments (or predates the use of DoCs) labels Dec 9, 2018
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2018 milestone Feb 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion DoC This has been referenced from a Disposition of Comments (or predates the use of DoCs)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants