-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Editorial improvements to the Amended Rec process text #93
Conversation
Improved definition of amended rec, clarify an otherwise, (weakly requested) move the defining place for amended rec
<dd>Where there is no Working Group chartered to maintain a Recommendation W3C may produce a new | ||
version which W3C publishes as an Amended version of the Recommendation.</dd> | ||
<dd>An <dfn id="rec-amended">Amended Recommendation</dfn> is a Recommendation that is amended to include <a href="#correction-classes">substantive | ||
changes that do not add new features</a>, and is produced by the W3C at a time when the Recommendation does not fit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would reverse the order of the sub-clauses, along the line sof
... is produced by W3C w/out WG. An Amended Rec must not include new features.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems plausible, draft away, and I'll comment if needed
LGTM. |
Improved definition of amended rec, clarify an otherwise, (weakly requested) move the defining place for amended rec
No description provided.