Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Editorial improvements to the Amended Rec process text #93

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 19, 2017
Merged

Editorial improvements to the Amended Rec process text #93

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
12049c6
strongly-desired editorials for amended recs
dwsinger Sep 12, 2017
1e38e30
Merge branch 'gh-pages' of https://github.com/dwsinger/w3process into…
dwsinger Sep 12, 2017
9ddb070
strongly-desired editorials for amended recs
dwsinger Sep 12, 2017
982d916
Merge branch 'gh-pages' of https://github.com/dwsinger/w3process into…
dwsinger Sep 15, 2017
8e72f9d
final(?) text for 6-day and dismissal for cause, issues #23 and #33
dwsinger Sep 19, 2017
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 5 additions & 4 deletions index.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1843,8 +1843,9 @@ <h4 id="maturity-levels">6.1.2 Maturity Levels</h4>
<dd>A Working Group may make editorial or other minor corrections to a Recommendation, and produce a new
version which W3C publishes as a revised edition of the Recommendation.</dd>
<dt>An Amended Recommendation</dt>
<dd>Where there is no Working Group chartered to maintain a Recommendation W3C may produce a new
version which W3C publishes as an Amended version of the Recommendation.</dd>
<dd>An <dfn id="rec-amended">Amended Recommendation</dfn> is a Recommendation that is amended to include <a href="#correction-classes">substantive
changes that do not add new features</a>, and is produced by the W3C at a time when the Recommendation does not fit
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would reverse the order of the sub-clauses, along the line sof

... is produced by W3C w/out WG. An Amended Rec must not include new features.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems plausible, draft away, and I'll comment if needed

within the charter of any active Working Group.</dd>
<dt id="RecsObs">Obsolete or Superseded Recommendation</dt>
<dd>An Obsolete Recommendation is a specification that the W3C believes no longer has enough market relevance
to continue recommending it for implementation, but which does not have fundamental problems
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2439,8 +2440,8 @@ <h4 id="revised-rec">6.7.2 Revising a Recommendation</h4>
<a href="#last-call">Candidate Recommendation</a>, without passing through earlier maturity levels.</p>

<p>If the publication was requested by a Working Group, the resulting Recommendation is called an
<dfn id="rec-edited">Edited Recommendation</dfn>. Otherwise, the resulting Recommendation is called an
<dfn id="rec-amended">Amended Recommendation</dfn>.</p>
<dfn id="rec-edited">Edited Recommendation</dfn>. If the publication was requested by the W3C in the absence of a Working Group,
the resulting Recommendation is called an <a href="#rec-amended">Amended Recommendation</a>.</p>

<p>When requesting the publication of an Edited Recommendation as described in this section, in addition to meeting the
requirements for the relevant maturity level, a Working Group</p>
Expand Down