-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Turn the WG into a maintenance WG #110
Conversation
|
Supportive of the charter, with @iherman's changes applied. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 with @iherman's changes applied.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks PA
All of @iherman's suggestions should now be addressed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left one comment; approving once that is taken in consideration (it is just an editorial change).
clarification suggested by @iherman Co-authored-by: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the RDF-DEV CG should be replaced with the RDF-star WG for coordination. I wouldn’t be adverse to listing both, but the RDF-DEV CG isn’t working on RDF-star at this point.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've committed a couple of changes to the scope section to refer to the published explainer doc (https://www.w3.org/TR/rch-explainer/) rather than the local copy which seems broken anyway. Ignore that commit if you disagree.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @pchampin. I approve it with a few editorial suggestions similar to those made by @philarcher.
Co-authored-by: Dan Yamamoto <dan@iij.ad.jp>
following @gkellogg's suggestion
@peacekeeper I need you to approve the PR before I can merge it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor, editorial
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Preview | Diff