-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Charter extension 2024-03 #57
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK as far as I can tell.
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Is this an opportunity to change the name of the WG to "RDF 1.2 Working Group"? "RDF 1.2" is used in the document names and their URLs. Renaming a GH repository does leave indirection in place. I realise that changing the name of the WG may not be practical. |
The SPARQL 1.2 Community Group is now the SPARQL Dev Community Group. Even though the RDF Dataset Canonicalization WG charter expires this summer, they should probably be listed for coordination. |
To be clear: in retrospect, I prefer "RDF 1.2", I wish we had chose that name of the WG instead of "RDF-star". However, I'm afraid that some people might perceive a renaming as an attempt to change the scope of the WG, and that it would create unnecessary friction. When we have our RECs published (RDF 1.2 xyz and SPARQL 1.2 xyz) and we go to a maintenance group on these specs, I think it will be less controversial to rename to "RDF 1.2 WG". But before that, I'm reluctant. |
It's tricky. At the move to a maintenance group, a change of name may cause increased expectations. How about adding to the description to explain the change of name because of the existing remit over all the docs? |
I wonder if the issue with TAG discussions on Polyglot formats bears any relation on RDF/XML or SPARQL Result formats. It would also impact RDFa and CSVW, which we're not working on, but are related. See https://github.com/ietf-wg-mediaman/suffixes/issues and https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/iWc8TLcWOyO0jyqeiuF9VCZClIs/. |
see PR #58 |
Co-authored-by: Andy Seaborne <andy@seaborne.org>
Preview | Diff
Preview | Diff