Auto Conformance section - words are not complete

[riannella]

Respec auto adds the following Conformance section wording:

"The key words may, must, optional, and required are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]."

However, RFC2119 recommends a slightly different set of terms, and we repeat the same duplicates:

• May is the same as Optional
• Must is the same as Required

We also do not include any prohibitive terms.

We should consider updating this text to read:

"The key words must (or required), must not, should, should not, and may (or optional) are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]."

[marcoscaceres]

This change seems ok to me. At some point, I'd like to make this smarter and only include the set of keywords that actually appear in the document.

[halindrome]

Actually, it already only includes the terms that are used in the document.

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Marcos Cáceres notifications@github.com
wrote:

This change seems ok to me. At some point, I'd like to make this smarter
and only include the set of keywords that actually appear in the document.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#927 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAfx8Js3E6Iq7qdkpxKJCL6DHiI--NhDks5qlOncgaJpZM4JxK-x
.

Shane McCarron
halindrome@gmail.com

[marcoscaceres]

We are so awesome :)

[marcoscaceres]

Ok, but then we must have a bug if @riannella's terms are not showing up.

@riannella's, what's the spec text that you have that is currently not showing up, so I can create a test case for it.

[riannella]

Nope - it is working as specified...I just added a "must not" and it then appeared in the conformance section (magic!) (I should hit re-load more often!)
So it is working fine...
(Closing this issue)