Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve wording in the "Sensor garbage collection" session #373

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 25, 2018

Conversation

rakuco
Copy link
Member

@rakuco rakuco commented Sep 25, 2018

"Eligible for garbage collection" can sound ambiguous and lead to
implementers thinking this is a step that happens prior to garbage
collection itself, whereas the original intent of the text added in pull
request #248 ("Be explicit about steps taken when a Sensor instance is
GCed") was that a sensor that is being GCed must be deactivated if
necessary.

Fixes #372.


Preview | Diff

"Eligible for garbage collection" can sound ambiguous and lead to
implementers thinking this is a step that happens prior to garbage
collection itself, whereas the original intent of the text added in pull
request w3c#248 ("Be explicit about steps taken when a Sensor instance is
GCed") was that a sensor that _is being GCed_ must be deactivated if
necessary.

Fixes w3c#372.
@rakuco
Copy link
Member Author

rakuco commented Sep 25, 2018

@anssiko @phoddie Let me know if this is enough to clarify any confusion surrounding this topic or if it's just related to #372 but does not fix it.

index.html has quite a few unrelated changes, but I guess it's just due to a different Bikeshed version being used.

@anssiko
Copy link
Member

anssiko commented Sep 25, 2018

@rakuco thanks, looks good to me.

(The index.html noise is indeed due to Bikeshed version differences. I just pulled in the latest to confirm.)

@phoddie
Copy link

phoddie commented Sep 25, 2018

@rakuco, this change makes the garbage collection behavior clear. Thank you.

@anssiko
Copy link
Member

anssiko commented Sep 25, 2018

@reillyeon, PTAL and merge if you’re happy with this clarification.

@reillyeon
Copy link
Member

These changes look good to me but I don't have permission to merge.

@anssiko
Copy link
Member

anssiko commented Sep 25, 2018

@reillyeon, please check your inbox :-)

@reillyeon
Copy link
Member

It looks like GItHub is taking its time actually granting me the powers it says I have.

@reillyeon reillyeon merged commit ac1df04 into w3c:master Sep 25, 2018
@rakuco rakuco deleted the sensor-gc-wording branch September 26, 2018 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants