Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flexibility in Conformance question #362

Open
paulairy opened this issue Feb 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Flexibility in Conformance question #362

paulairy opened this issue Feb 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
migration: core Issues that raise core questions that are still open for discussion status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal Subgroup: Conformance Options

Comments

@paulairy
Copy link

We seek feedback on whether this flexibility will be beneficial in encouraging content providers to meet conformance because it is more achievable or whether content providers are less likely to improve accessibility if they aren’t required to. We also seek feedback on the conformance approach as a whole.

  • I think this flexibility is beneficial. If organisations want to implement accessibility, they will. If they don’t, they won’t. This makes it more achievable, and the scoring system invites organisations to raise the bar in their conformance.
@colabottles
Copy link

Thank you for your comment. Project members are working on your comment. You may see discussion in the comment thread and we may ask for additional information as we work on it. We will mark the official response when we are finished and close the issue.

@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley added the migration: core Issues that raise core questions that are still open for discussion label Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
migration: core Issues that raise core questions that are still open for discussion status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal Subgroup: Conformance Options
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants