Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Start using URL (instead of URI reference) #420

Open
annevk opened this issue Apr 21, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Start using URL (instead of URI reference) #420

annevk opened this issue Apr 21, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Apr 21, 2018

I noticed in whatwg/html#3591 that apparently this term is still somewhat prevalent. Wherever SVG drives parsing of URLs (or mentions them) it would be good to update it to use https://url.spec.whatwg.org/ like the rest of the web platform.

@dirkschulze
Copy link
Contributor

Though I don’t think it is controversial: adding it on the agenda request.

@css-meeting-bot
Copy link
Member

The Working Group just discussed Start using URL (instead of URI reference) #420, and agreed to the following resolutions:

  • RESOLUTION: Start using https://url.spec.whatwg.org lie the rest of web platform
The full IRC log of that discussion <BogdanBrinza> topic: Start using URL (instead of URI reference) #420
<BogdanBrinza> GitHub: https://github.com//issues/420
<krit> krit: Request use WHATWG URL spec instead of URI from IETF/
<krit> dstorey: we already have normative references to HTML from WHATWG
<krit> krit: In previous meetings there was no objection from Chris and Liam to normative reference to WHATWG.
<krit> BogdanBrinza: I'd be more comfortable with their input
<BogdanBrinza> RESOLUTION: Start using https://url.spec.whatwg.org lie the rest of web platform
<krit> s/lie/like/
<krit> BogdanBrinza: Other members can object later.

@boggydigital boggydigital added this to the SVG 2.0 Recommendation milestone Jun 11, 2018
@svgeesus svgeesus self-assigned this Jul 30, 2018
@dirkschulze dirkschulze self-assigned this Oct 27, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants