Clarify character related definitions. #263, #262, #259. #522
Conversation
|
@r12a could you take a look at this PR as well to verify that the issues got fixed? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As I said on the last call, I think it's okay to merge this with the understanding that additional changes still need to be made.
In particular, the definition of "addressable character" and use of the term will need to be completely revamped based on #537, where it was agreed to match implementations and use different string-indexing methods for layout attributes versus for DOM methods. So we can't have a single term that defines them both.
But the specific edits here are still useful clarifications, separate from the normative changes.
I'm also OK with no changes appendix entry for these edits, since they are editorial clarifications not normative changes. But when you do add the normative bits to this PR, then you could maybe mention "and clarified some text-related definitions".
Anyway: I'll leave it up to you to merge or add further edits, @Tavmjong.
|
I'm going to go ahead and merge this... and then work on #537. |
Attempt to address I18N comments in #263, #262, and #259.