Join GitHub today
Handling of LWSP in tts:fontFamily #248
Whether or not LWSP is permitted around comma delimiters in
The Working Group just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<nigel> Topic: Handling of LWSP in tts:fontFamily ttml1#248
<nigel> github: https://github.com//issues/248
<nigel> -> https://github.com//pull/290 State that LWSPs are permitted in tts:fontFamily Pull Request #290
<nigel> Pierre: Based on the result of the long conversation and survey I implemented the preferred
<nigel> .. view. Glenn has objected to it.
<nigel> Glenn: There's new information - there is no known implementation that is affected.
<nigel> .. Ignoring the process issues, I have no problem with the disrecommendation but the
<nigel> .. rationale is lame, and we should not add rationales in at all - certainly not in this note.
<nigel> .. If someone could point out an implementation then I would change my opinion.
<nigel> Pierre: The proposed text was on the issue and you approved it back then Glenn.
<nigel> Glenn: That's irrelevant.
<nigel> ack cyril
<nigel> Cyril: I agree with Glenn that the rationale part is not helpful.
<nigel> Andreas: I disagree with both of you. It is incomplete if you do not explain why the recommendation
<nigel> .. is present.
<nigel> Pierre: From a process perspective we have to move forward with the resolution we agreed.
<nigel> Glenn: What was added in the pull request is not what was in the issue.
<nigel> Pierre: That is a good point, I don't know why I used the phrase "maximal compatibility".
<nigel> Glenn: I might accept a new sentence saying something about existing processors.
<nigel> Pierre: I can edit this here and now while we have everyone who cares about it.
<nigel> .. [edits with input from the group]
<nigel> .. [pushes updated text]
<nigel> Glenn: I approved this.
<nigel> Andreas: I already approved too.
<nigel> Pierre: Thank you so much, apologies for the confusion.
<nigel> RESOLUTION: Group approves merge of this pull request as at 186591d