-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider applying ipd or bpd to content images #140
Comments
I cannot see any specification now for what happens if an image is placed in a span that specifies ipd and bpd, and the extent of the image is not equal to that specified size. I agree that it seems reasonable to specify an implied scaling semantic in that case. |
@nigelmegitt regarding #140 (comment), this was (originally) about using ipd/bpd on |
@skynavga I'm still not clear from the current ED what the image presentation semantic is though: §9.1.5 image includes:
And §10.2.16 tts:extent says:
So we see that the width and height of the image are overridden or determined by setting
Possibly there are other options! I think we need to be specific, probably that we mean option 1. Or please point me to the existing text that I've failed to find... |
…arify image usage in defining context.
Add note in c14d76a regarding anamorphic scaling. |
Why is the anamorphic scaling semantic defined only in a note and not made normative? Probably this is something we should discuss. I was not expecting a non-normative resolution to this issue, so in my view it is not yet closed. |
Addressed in afead4c. |
It's reasonable to apply ipd and bpd to image and have an implied scaling semantic. People are already used to that concept in HTML.
(raised by Glenn Adams on 2015-04-10)
From tracker issue http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/387
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: