New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Featurize offset times w/o metric. #752
Comments
See #113 - that issue was closed without a change. I don't think we actually agreed to make the metric optional, and I recall discussing it and agreeing that it would be a bad idea. However I can not find a documentation trail for that, so it's possible that discussion related to a different metric, e.g. on a length, and that my memory is at fault. Regardless of that, my preference here would be to revert to the TTML1 specification and make the metric required. |
I'm not aware of the history of the introduction of this change, but I would prefer to not have the ability to omit the metric as well. It is imprecise to not specify it and less easier to read for humans (possibly requires a spec lookup to be sure about that "default metric"). And of course it is not too expensive to specifiy it. |
The Working Group just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<nigel> Topic: Featurize offset times w/o metric. ttml2#752<nigel> github: https://github.com//issues/752 <nigel> Glenn: I'll prepare a pull request to bring this back to TTML1 syntax by removing the <nigel> .. optionality of metric. Then we can hold off on review until the pull request stage. <nigel> Nigel: Sounds good. <nigel> SUMMARY: @skynavga to prepare a pull request to remove the optionality of metric on time expressions |
Revert optionality of metric (#752).
Since TTML2, a
<time-expression>
with offset time may also be specified without a metric, in which case the seconds metric applies. The different#time-offset*
features however don't consider this case in any of the syntax subsets.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: