Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vibration API Recommendation errata #1

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 19, 2016
Merged

Conversation

anssiko
Copy link
Member

@anssiko anssiko commented Feb 9, 2016

These non-normative changes align the Vibration API spec with the
latest Page Visibility API spec by tapping into its hooks defined
post-Vibration API Recommendation publication:

  • determine if the document is hidden
  • visibility states

In addition, terminology is clarified as follows:

  • browsing context -> top-level browsing context

The privacy and security considerations section was added

Link to the Simplified Chinese translation was added

These non-normative changes align the Vibration API spec with the
latest Page Visibility API spec by tapping into its hooks defined
post-Vibration API Recommendation publication:

- determine if the document is hidden
- visibility states

In addition, terminology is clarified as follows:

- browsing context -> top-level browsing context
@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented Feb 16, 2016

@chaals Updated as follows: anssiko@ad43bf8

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

where do we stand on this? what's our next step to the PER transition?

@anssiko anssiko merged commit 1cee156 into w3c:gh-pages Apr 19, 2016
@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented Apr 19, 2016

I merged this PR, since no concerns were raised for the proposed changes.

Please review it in context at https://w3c.github.io/vibration/

@dontcallmedom If this looks good, then I'd expect we publish a PER using this ED as the source. I still need to update the Status of This Document. Any specific text needed for PER, or is the usual diff from REC2PER fine?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants