Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[editorial] Council composition statement spends too much time on exceptions #679

Closed
fantasai opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Type: Editorial improvements
Milestone

Comments

@fantasai
Copy link
Collaborator

In https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Drafts/#council-composition most of the words in the introductory sentence are dedicated to outlining the exceptions, and this is a bit awkward. Filing this issue as a reminder to try to improve the phrasing here.

@w3c w3c deleted a comment from Nealit25 Dec 15, 2022
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Deferred milestone Jan 11, 2023
frivoal added a commit to frivoal/w3process that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2023
@frivoal frivoal added Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call and removed Needs proposed PR labels Jan 25, 2023
@css-meeting-bot
Copy link
Member

The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed [editorial] Council composition statement spends too much time on exceptions, and agreed to the following:

  • RESOLVED: merge https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/706
The full IRC log of that discussion <fantasai> florian: Editorial issue as well, sentence that introduces composition of the Council spent more time discussing the exceptions than the main topic
<fantasai> ... a number of attempts to shorten and improve sentence
<fantasai> ... so a smaller % spent on discussing the exception
<fantasai> ... a number of attempts, updated PR with the growing consensus
<fantasai> ... so it's a little shorter, and exception in parens, so seems like an improvement
<fantasai> plh: Concur, though in the grand scheme we need to simplify Process
<fantasai> florian: Don't think a few words here or there makes a difference
<fantasai> plh: Any objections to merging #706?
<TallTed> +1 merge #706
<fantasai> RESOLVED: merge https://github.com//pull/706

@css-meeting-bot css-meeting-bot removed the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label Feb 22, 2023
frivoal added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2023
See #679

Co-authored-by: fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net>
@frivoal frivoal added the Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion label Feb 22, 2023
@frivoal frivoal modified the milestones: Deferred, Process 2023 Feb 22, 2023
@frivoal frivoal closed this as completed Feb 22, 2023
@frivoal frivoal added Commenter satisfied/accepting conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice and removed Commenter satisfied/accepting conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice labels Mar 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Type: Editorial improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants