Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Editorial] Adjust grounding of RF distribution of specifications #681

Closed
ianbjacobs opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #705
Closed

[Editorial] Adjust grounding of RF distribution of specifications #681

ianbjacobs opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #705
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Type: Editorial improvements
Milestone

Comments

@ianbjacobs
Copy link

Section 7.1 says, "Per the Membership Agreement, W3C technical reports (and software) are available free of charge to the general public; (refer to the W3C Document License [DOC-LICENSE])."

However, the Membership Agreement does not speak to that topic; it references the document licenses and those are the terms of the licenses.

Because the current sentence already refers to the document licenses, one fix is to simply remove "Per the Membership Agreement."

Another approach is to say:
"Per the [W3C Document License], W3C technical reports (and software) are available free of charge to the general public."

However, since we have at least two document licenses and the CG CLA, perhaps a broader reference would be useful:

"Per the [W3C Policies], W3C technical reports (and software) are available free of charge to the general public."

For the link:
https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/ipr-notice-20021231

@frivoal frivoal added this to the Deferred milestone Jan 11, 2023
frivoal added a commit to frivoal/w3process that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2023
@frivoal frivoal added Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call and removed Needs proposed PR labels Jan 25, 2023
@frivoal frivoal linked a pull request Feb 8, 2023 that will close this issue
@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion and removed Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call labels Feb 8, 2023
@frivoal frivoal modified the milestones: Deferred, Process 2023 Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Type: Editorial improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants