-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Links with different names pointing to equal resources in Related Resources in Understanding SC 3.3.8: Accessible Authentication (Minimum) #3597
Conversation
- Removed redundant unnecessary link in related resouces - Removed full stops from the list items
I removed the PR from the Project, since we have the issue already in the list. |
<li><a href="https://webauthn.io/">WebAuthN Demo site</a>.</li> | ||
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OAuth">OAuth on Wikipedia</a>.</li> | ||
<li><a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/">WebAuthN specification</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Authentication_API">Web Authentication API on MDN</a></li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will produce this list of links:
- WebAuthN specification
- Web Authentication API on MDN
- WebAuthN Demo site
I think that we should be grouping the WebAuthN links like:
- WebAuthN specification
- WebAuthN Demo site
- Web Authentication API on MDN
I don't understand the function of this, just seeing an odd ordering.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @mgifford. @giacomo-petri does this suggested order work for you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it works. I believe the intention was to present a list of references without a specific order. However, it would be even more beneficial if we could rearrange them to enhance the coherence of the reading sequence.
Additionally, I've addressed another typo in these links.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@giacomo-petri I'm just glancing through changes before tomorrow's meeting. The order appears to be the same still? Assuming you will reorder.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did it. Not sure what happened. Adjusting right now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In "Files changes" I see the proper order. Are you seeing something different?
Closes: #3596
-Security and Privacy Technologies issue paper from the Cognitive Task Force
They point to the same document, one hosted in https://w3c.github.io/, the other in https://rawgit.com/.