added interuptions #98
Conversation
and the glossary for easily availible
|
@lseeman can you confirm that this is related to Issue 47? |
|
yes. (as much as i can follow this) |
|
|
Pull request on #47 topic. |
| <section class="sc"> | ||
| <h4>Interruptions (minimum)</h4> | ||
| <p class="conformance-level">AA</p> | ||
| <p>There is an easily available mechanism to postpone and suppress interruptions and changes in content unless they are initiated by the user or involve anֲ emergency.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since the word "and" is used between postpone and suppress, the literal meaning would be that postponing the interruption is required, i.e. the mechanism must make the interruption reappear. I'm assuming this is not the intent. If so, I would recommend changing to "postpone or permanently suppress" to make the options clear.
Also, if postponing is an option, I'd highly recommend requiring a minimum time before the interruption reappears.
| <ul> | ||
| <li>can be set one time with as wide a scope as possible (such as using the standards of the OS, From ISO 9241-112 or GPII when available) </li> | ||
| <li>has the option to save or change the setting, where available interoperably, but also for the scope of the set of web pages </li> | ||
| <li>is reachable from each screen where it may be needed, and the path and the control conforms to all of this document</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Replace "screen" with "webpage", which has an existing glossary definition
- Delete "and the path and control conforms to all of this document". This is not only implied in my opinion, but also does not specify a conformance level and conflicts/overlaps with Note 2 in the definition of mechanism.
- "Reachable" is not defined and so this requirement is very vague. Technically, if I need to click Settings and then jump through 10 pages of controls to get to the mechanism for suppressing the interruption, that is reachable.
If the intent here is to be able to suppress with a single click, then maybe something like: "able to be set without any change of content".
| <dd> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>can be set one time with as wide a scope as possible (such as using the standards of the OS, From ISO 9241-112 or GPII when available) </li> | ||
| <li>has the option to save or change the setting, where available interoperably, but also for the scope of the set of web pages </li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The latter part of this requirement is dangling (i.e. "but also..." only contains a prepositional phrase). I'd like to help with rewording, but I'm confused by the intent of this bullet versus the previous one. They both seem to be dealing with scope of the setting. Can you clarify the distinction?
| <dt><dfn>easily available (or easily available mode or setting) one or more of the following are true:</dfn></dt> | ||
| <dd> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>can be set one time with as wide a scope as possible (such as using the standards of the OS, From ISO 9241-112 or GPII when available) </li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the spirit of accessibility, expand the acronyms for OS and GPII.
and the glossary for easily availible