Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial changes around exposing NFC standards related text #361

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 4, 2019

Conversation

zolkis
Copy link
Contributor

@zolkis zolkis commented Oct 1, 2019

  • Added localBiblio references to more NFC RTD specs.
  • Replaced "Web NFC message" with "NDEF message" (fixes After removing special record, get rid of Web NFC message terminology #343)
  • Added NDEF record related info, including well-known type definitions.
  • Reordered the NFC standards related content for easier readability (standards related informal stuff in one place).
  • Examples now come after Use Cases and Features.

Work might be still needed on consistency of terms between NFC standards informative section and normative sections. Also, Examples need to be checked.


Preview | Diff

…DEF message'.

Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kis <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
…eadability.

Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kis <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kis <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kis <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
@zolkis
Copy link
Contributor Author

zolkis commented Oct 2, 2019

Note: since not supported ATM, I kept signature and handover records sections at minimum.

Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kis <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
index.html Outdated
<!-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Introduction - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -->
<section class="informative"> <h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>
In general, there are following groups of user scenarios for NFC:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in general, you can group the user scenarios of NFC into the following groups:

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was taught to use passive constructs in articles (and I assume specs) :).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe then

NFC user scenarios can be grouped as follows:

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BTW I just copied these use cases, so an English proofreading is due for the whole spec.

index.html Outdated
</li>
<li>
Hold two active devices, e.g. phones or tablets, in close proximity
in order to push an <a>NDEF message</a> from one device to the other.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why say NDEF message here and 'data' above? Maybe we should just say data

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

index.html Outdated
<li>Card emulation
<ol>
<li>
With a secure element: for payments by holding your phone close to a
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for payments? remove for?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

index.html Outdated
<ol>
<li>
With a secure element: for payments by holding your phone close to a
point-of-sales terminal, instead of swiping a payment card.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove swiping... many cards support contact less as well

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

index.html Outdated
With a secure element: for payments by holding your phone close to a
point-of-sales terminal, instead of swiping a payment card.
</li>
<li>With host card emulation: for allowing use-cases like using a phone
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add (HCE) after host card emulation

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

index.html Outdated
</ul>
</p>
<p>
NFC works using magnetic induction, meaning that the reader will emit a
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reader (active powered device)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

index.html Outdated
<a>NDEF record</a>s. <dfn>NDEF</dfn> is an abbreviation for NFC Forum
Data Exchange Format, a lightweight binary message format. NDEF messages
can be stored on an <a>NFC tag</a> or exchanged between NFC-enabled devices.
<a>NDEF record</a>s. NDEF messages can be stored on an <a>NFC tag</a> or exchanged between NFC-enabled devices.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

break line

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

index.html Outdated
<section class="informative"> <h3>NDEF compatible tag types</h3>
<p>
The NFC Forum has mandated the support of five different tag types to be
operable with NFC devices. The same is required on operating systems such
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

, before such

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

</p>
<p>
Card emulation mode capabilities also depend on the NFC chip in the device.
For payments, a Secure Element is often needed.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

describe secure element? or link to something?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe not in this PR. I haven't found a good public domain definition at first try.

index.html Outdated
For payments, a Secure Element is often needed.
</p>
<p class="note">
This document does not aim supporting all possible use cases of NFC
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

aim at*

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

index.html Outdated
Comment on lines 384 to 386
This document does not aim supporting all possible use cases of NFC
technology, but only a few use cases which are considered relevant to be
used by web pages in browsers, using the browser security model.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually we are trying to expand the scope, so maybe we should just remove this note

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

index.html Outdated
perform certain activities between the two devices, such as sending photos
to the other device, printing to a Bluetooth printer or streaming video to
a television set.
Icon records are <a>MIME type record</a>s. Readers SHOULD select one icon
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

of MIME type "image/ ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, one icon record. Will specify like that.

index.html Outdated
URI record.
</p>
<p>
The action record has <a>NFC Forum local type</a> "`act`" specific to
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a double space between record and has

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

index.html Outdated
<p>
The action record has <a>NFC Forum local type</a> "`act`" specific to
smart poster and the <a>PAYLOAD field</a> contains a single byte. If its
value is `0`, it means "do the action" (depending on type, this might mean
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe add a table for showing the values?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only 3 valid values... maybe later. Then I'd need to copy the table from the NDEF spec, something I didn't want to do.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can redo it from your own text

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That table would be incomplete compared to the NDEF spec, thus it would be confusing. Implementations are only interested in these 3 values. I can also remove this section (just say that it denotes an action specified in the NDEF spec), since Web NFC actually does not act on Sp, it leaves that to apps - so it's the app developers who should read the NDEF spec for Sp.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, please leave it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK - I am not even sure Sp records are not hijacked by the underlying platform. I think on Android they are not, but need to check.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made a table and added more verbose comments that didn't fit the table.

index.html Outdated
<dfn>NDEF Signature</dfn> is defined [[NDEF-SIGNATURE]].
Its <a>TYPE field</a> contains "`Sig`" (`0x53`, `0x69`, `0x67`) and its
<a>PAYLOAD field</a> contains version, signature and a certificate chain.
Web NFC does not support this at the moment.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well we can read it as toArrayBuffer no?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if we read it at all, or should we?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we cannot go for full support now, and we'd need to spec it properly. Out of scope for this release.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would say that we should read all and allow to get bytes.. that offers a way for devs to work around us not having specced everything

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would be a new feature for the current spec and needs to be discussed in its own issue. It's definitely not in the scope for this PR. I can remove all the sig record related text if that makes it better.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No it's fine, but please file an issue

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I will. I just thought this is not properly spec'd (just basic information) and maybe would be better to skip it now and add it later. But let's leave this text in for now and we'll work on it anyway soon.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a comment and reference to the issue.

index.html Outdated
The negotiated communication carrier would then be used (separately) to
perform certain activities between the two devices, such as sending photos
to the other device, printing to a Bluetooth printer or streaming video to
a television set. Web NFC does not support this at the moment.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I rather we add an issue and create a "note" or "issue" or what it is called in respec, linking to that

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMV it's orthogonal if we have or don't have an issue for the missing feature. But we could do it (later), it would be nice.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added #364, see also #313

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a comment and reference to the issue.

application specified data types and are defined in [[[NFC-RTD]]].
</p>
<p>
The external type is a URN with the prefix `"urn:nfc:ext:"` followed by
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mentioning URN is not recommended in W3C specs and the urn is all fictional as well as that is never written anywhere!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should really just avoid mentioning the URN and just state how it is written

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comes from the NDEF spec, and they use URN. This is an informative section that explains how NDEF is supposed to work.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still there is specs docs from W3C saying to avoid due to a multitude of issues, and all this is useless because it's not even written as a URN...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't use URN in the spec. We explain what URN means in the NDEF spec.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought this was important to understanding how external vs global and local types work. If I remove that text, it remains vaguely explained. With that thinking we could get rid of the whole informative explanation section, as developers can read the NDEF specs themselves.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They most likely won't read that or have access. I just think we can explain it without referring to URNs at all, but leave it for now

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's sleep on this one. I don't see much harm in exposing the NDEF logic for information, but let me think it over, whether talking about URN (which I agree makes little sense in the NDEF spec to start with) would confuse any wandering soul. It would be pity to lose anyone to the dark side of the Web :).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Kenneth, the URN's are mentioned (by you, AFAICT) in other places in the spec, too.
I suggest we merge this like this and take up the issue of URNs separately.

index.html Outdated
<a>TNF field</a> MUST be `6` (unchanged).
</li>
<li>
The terminating chunk record has this flag cleared, and in rest undergo the same rules as the middle chunk records.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wrap line

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

index.html Outdated
Forum, many commercial products such as bus cards, door openers may be based
on the <a>MIFARE Standard</a> which require specific NFC chips (same vendor of
card and reader) in order to function.
In general, pushing data to another Web NFC capable device requires that
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove Web, it might not even run a web browser

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

index.html Outdated
@@ -1190,6 +1396,10 @@ <h4>
used for implementing security policies, for instance the authenticity of
<a>record identifier</a>, unless a <a>prearranged trust relationship</a> exists.
</p>
<p>
Security considerations for media types in general are discussed in
[[RFC2048]] and for “application” media types in [[RFC2046]].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird " you are using there

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, fixed

Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kis <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
@zolkis
Copy link
Contributor Author

zolkis commented Oct 4, 2019

Merging.
2 remaining issues:

  • link to Secure Element
  • what to do with URN's.

@zolkis zolkis merged commit caeacb1 into w3c:gh-pages Oct 4, 2019
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2020
The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2020
The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2020
The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2020
The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2049831
Reviewed-by: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rijubrata Bhaumik <rijubrata.bhaumik@intel.com>
Commit-Queue: Wanming Lin <wanming.lin@intel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#740920}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2020
The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2049831
Reviewed-by: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rijubrata Bhaumik <rijubrata.bhaumik@intel.com>
Commit-Queue: Wanming Lin <wanming.lin@intel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#740920}
pull bot pushed a commit to FreddyZeng/chromium that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2020
The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2049831
Reviewed-by: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rijubrata Bhaumik <rijubrata.bhaumik@intel.com>
Commit-Queue: Wanming Lin <wanming.lin@intel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#740920}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2020
The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
moz-v2v-gh pushed a commit to mozilla/gecko-dev that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2020
… a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Add WPT tests for smart poster

The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2049831
Reviewed-by: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rijubrata Bhaumik <rijubrata.bhaumik@intel.com>
Commit-Queue: Wanming Lin <wanming.lin@intel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#740920}

--

wpt-commits: d97d4ef04045fab6457f1ea59c41bec7bd1fd191
wpt-pr: 21746
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
xeonchen pushed a commit to xeonchen/gecko that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
… a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Add WPT tests for smart poster

The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2049831
Reviewed-by: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rijubrata Bhaumik <rijubrata.bhaumik@intel.com>
Commit-Queue: Wanming Lin <wanming.lin@intel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#740920}

--

wpt-commits: d97d4ef04045fab6457f1ea59c41bec7bd1fd191
wpt-pr: 21746
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
… a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Add WPT tests for smart poster

The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2049831
Reviewed-by: Leon Han <leon.hanintel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rijubrata Bhaumik <rijubrata.bhaumikintel.com>
Commit-Queue: Wanming Lin <wanming.linintel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master{#740920}

--

wpt-commits: d97d4ef04045fab6457f1ea59c41bec7bd1fd191
wpt-pr: 21746

UltraBlame original commit: 3cf1e0f17a7d54726e6c5f3fce7c4fd46a119f4e
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified-and-comments-removed that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
… a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Add WPT tests for smart poster

The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2049831
Reviewed-by: Leon Han <leon.hanintel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rijubrata Bhaumik <rijubrata.bhaumikintel.com>
Commit-Queue: Wanming Lin <wanming.linintel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master{#740920}

--

wpt-commits: d97d4ef04045fab6457f1ea59c41bec7bd1fd191
wpt-pr: 21746

UltraBlame original commit: 3cf1e0f17a7d54726e6c5f3fce7c4fd46a119f4e
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-comments-removed that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
… a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Add WPT tests for smart poster

The spec changes:
- w3c/web-nfc#361
- w3c/web-nfc#495

BUG=520391

Change-Id: Ida502501e7ec4775035057d8fa548dfb868a8e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2049831
Reviewed-by: Leon Han <leon.hanintel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rijubrata Bhaumik <rijubrata.bhaumikintel.com>
Commit-Queue: Wanming Lin <wanming.linintel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master{#740920}

--

wpt-commits: d97d4ef04045fab6457f1ea59c41bec7bd1fd191
wpt-pr: 21746

UltraBlame original commit: 3cf1e0f17a7d54726e6c5f3fce7c4fd46a119f4e
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2020
The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2020
The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2038492
Commit-Queue: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillyg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: François Beaufort <beaufort.francois@gmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#743864}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2038492
Commit-Queue: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillyg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: François Beaufort <beaufort.francois@gmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#743864}
pull bot pushed a commit to FreddyZeng/chromium that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2038492
Commit-Queue: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillyg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: François Beaufort <beaufort.francois@gmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#743864}
xeonchen pushed a commit to xeonchen/gecko that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2020
…oster records, a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Support reading/writing smart-poster records

The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2038492
Commit-Queue: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillyg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: François Beaufort <beaufort.francois@gmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#743864}

--

wpt-commits: 89a8f08c2a04508b40c8819d785c5ce7369dcf68
wpt-pr: 21799
moz-v2v-gh pushed a commit to mozilla/gecko-dev that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2020
…oster records, a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Support reading/writing smart-poster records

The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2038492
Commit-Queue: Leon Han <leon.han@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillyg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: François Beaufort <beaufort.francois@gmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#743864}

--

wpt-commits: 89a8f08c2a04508b40c8819d785c5ce7369dcf68
wpt-pr: 21799
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2020
…oster records, a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Support reading/writing smart-poster records

The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2038492
Commit-Queue: Leon Han <leon.hanintel.com>
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillygchromium.org>
Reviewed-by: François Beaufort <beaufort.francoisgmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master{#743864}

--

wpt-commits: 89a8f08c2a04508b40c8819d785c5ce7369dcf68
wpt-pr: 21799

UltraBlame original commit: 580550ae487bb2e8304198acb730ab591da24e10
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified-and-comments-removed that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2020
…oster records, a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Support reading/writing smart-poster records

The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2038492
Commit-Queue: Leon Han <leon.hanintel.com>
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillygchromium.org>
Reviewed-by: François Beaufort <beaufort.francoisgmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master{#743864}

--

wpt-commits: 89a8f08c2a04508b40c8819d785c5ce7369dcf68
wpt-pr: 21799

UltraBlame original commit: 580550ae487bb2e8304198acb730ab591da24e10
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-comments-removed that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2020
…oster records, a=testonly

Automatic update from web-platform-tests
[webnfc] Support reading/writing smart-poster records

The spec changes:
w3c/web-nfc#361
w3c/web-nfc#495
w3c/web-nfc#536

BUG=520391

Change-Id: I00a363aba07d1f9f2f8e40212dca7650e26047a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2038492
Commit-Queue: Leon Han <leon.hanintel.com>
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillygchromium.org>
Reviewed-by: François Beaufort <beaufort.francoisgmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master{#743864}

--

wpt-commits: 89a8f08c2a04508b40c8819d785c5ce7369dcf68
wpt-pr: 21799

UltraBlame original commit: 580550ae487bb2e8304198acb730ab591da24e10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

After removing special record, get rid of Web NFC message terminology
2 participants