Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

offerToReceive: s/transceiver type/transceiver kind/ (and do it for kinds, not mediaTypes) #1681

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fippo
Copy link
Contributor

@fippo fippo commented Dec 6, 2017

clarifies #1672 (comment)
Also changes mediaType to kind for consistency.

@fippo fippo requested a review from fluffy as a code owner December 6, 2017 20:42
@fippo
Copy link
Contributor Author

fippo commented Dec 6, 2017

@adam-be can you please take a look?

webrtc.html Outdated
@@ -3314,7 +3314,7 @@ <h2>Attributes</h2>
</li>
<li>
<p>If <var>connection</var> has any stopped "sendrecv" or
"recvonly" transceivers of type <var>mediaType</var>, jump to
"recvonly" transceivers of kind <var>mediaType</var>, jump to
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe s/mediaType/mediaKind too? We might want to be even more specific. How about:

"recvonly" transceivers whose receiver.kind is mediaKind, jump to

?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

whose transceiver kind (with link to the definition)?

I agree that mediaKind would be more consistent language, will update.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just kind instead of mediaKind is even more consistent :-)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I forgot we had the transceiver kind definition.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So did I, obviously :)

clarifies w3c#1672 (comment)
Also changes mediaType to kind for consistency.
@fippo
Copy link
Contributor Author

fippo commented Dec 6, 2017

squashed after some great feedback from jib :-)

@fippo fippo changed the title offerToReceive: s/transceiver type/transceiver kind offerToReceive: s/transceiver type/transceiver kind/ (and do it for kinds, not mediaTypes) Dec 6, 2017
Copy link
Member

@adam-be adam-be left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to align with our existing definitions.

@fippo
Copy link
Contributor Author

fippo commented Dec 7, 2017

needs rebase after #1686

@alvestrand
Copy link
Contributor

Same problem was solved in #1686, so closing this one.

@alvestrand alvestrand closed this Dec 7, 2017
@fippo fippo deleted the transceiver-kind branch December 7, 2017 15:57
fippo added a commit to fippo/web-platform-tests that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
fippo added a commit to fippo/web-platform-tests that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants