-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
offerToReceive: s/transceiver type/transceiver kind/ (and do it for kinds, not mediaTypes) #1681
Conversation
@adam-be can you please take a look? |
webrtc.html
Outdated
@@ -3314,7 +3314,7 @@ <h2>Attributes</h2> | |||
</li> | |||
<li> | |||
<p>If <var>connection</var> has any stopped "sendrecv" or | |||
"recvonly" transceivers of type <var>mediaType</var>, jump to | |||
"recvonly" transceivers of kind <var>mediaType</var>, jump to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe s/mediaType
/mediaKind
too? We might want to be even more specific. How about:
"recvonly" transceivers whose receiver.kind
is mediaKind, jump to
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
whose transceiver kind (with link to the definition)?
I agree that mediaKind would be more consistent language, will update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just kind instead of mediaKind is even more consistent :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I forgot we had the transceiver kind definition.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So did I, obviously :)
clarifies w3c#1672 (comment) Also changes mediaType to kind for consistency.
2aa0559
to
cb8db92
Compare
squashed after some great feedback from jib :-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to align with our existing definitions.
needs rebase after #1686 |
Same problem was solved in #1686, so closing this one. |
spec change in w3c/webrtc-pc#1681
spec change in w3c/webrtc-pc#1681
clarifies #1672 (comment)
Also changes mediaType to kind for consistency.