Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: syntax highlighting of example 4, 51, 52, 60, 61, 65, 66, and 71 #1700

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 12, 2022
Merged

fix: syntax highlighting of example 4, 51, 52, 60, 61, 65, 66, and 71 #1700

merged 2 commits into from Oct 12, 2022

Conversation

danielpeintner
Copy link
Contributor

@danielpeintner danielpeintner commented Sep 29, 2022 •
edited by pr-preview bot

@danielpeintner
Copy link
Contributor Author

it used to look like this

grafik

and now looks like this

grafik

@danielpeintner danielpeintner added the Editorial Issues with no technical impact on implementations label Sep 29, 2022
@danielpeintner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: I fixed examples 51, 52, 60, 61, 65, 66, and 71 also which have the same issue...

@danielpeintner danielpeintner changed the title fix: syntax highlighting of example 4 fix: syntax highlighting of example 4, 51, 52, 60, 61, 65, 66, and 71 Oct 5, 2022
@danielpeintner danielpeintner mentioned this pull request Oct 5, 2022
Merged
@sebastiankb
Copy link
Contributor

from today's TD call, decided to merge

@sebastiankb sebastiankb merged commit d747531 into w3c:main Oct 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sebastiankb sebastiankb sebastiankb approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Editorial Issues with no technical impact on implementations
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@danielpeintner @sebastiankb