You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We haven't had TAG review specifically, but i18n reviewed it ages ago.
HTML also has a dependency on these properties for the UA style sheet: they were necessary to implement HTML default styling in a world where writing-mode exists, so both the WHATWG and W3C specs rely on it.
CSSWG cleared it for shipping when Firefox brought up the issue awhile back. You can't ship writing-mode for the Web without this feature. More info in the FPWD announcement at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0043.html
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):
open issues in our Github repo for each point of feedback
open a single issue in our Github repo for the entire review
leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello TAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of:
You should also know that...
Firefox already shipped most of the logical properties and values: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0040.html
Blink also implemented various logical properties, but mostly with a
-webkit-
prefix. The intent to implement and ship is https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/48OwfwZrbvIAccording to @fantasai,
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: