Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DisplayMediaStreamOptions monitorTypeSurfaces #892

Closed
1 task done
beaufortfrancois opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

DisplayMediaStreamOptions monitorTypeSurfaces #892

beaufortfrancois opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Progress: propose closing we think it should be closed but are waiting on some feedback or consensus Progress: review complete Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design Review type: later review Venue: WebRTC WebRTC and media capture

Comments

@beaufortfrancois
Copy link

beaufortfrancois commented Sep 1, 2023

こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting a TAG review of DisplayMediaStreamOptions monitorTypeSurfaces.

When getDisplayMedia() is called, the browser offers the user a choice of display surfaces: tabs, windows, or monitors. Using the monitorTypeSurfaces option, the web application may now hint to the browser if it prefers to include display surfaces whose type is monitor among the choices offered to the user. The browser may still ignore this hint. Web applications are therefore encouraged to still check the displaySurface setting of the tracks they receive.

Further details:

  • I have reviewed the TAG's Web Platform Design Principles
  • Relevant time constraints or deadlines: N/A
  • The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: W3C WebRTC Working Group
  • The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if current group is a community group or other incubation venue): W3C WebRTC Working Group
  • Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: N/A
  • This work is being funded by: Google

You should also know that this feature is a simple addition of a single flag to an existing dictionary, following an established pattern that’s also used by a few other keys of the same dictionary (selfBrowserSurface, systemAudio, surfaceSwitching). well-known patterns. We already filed a TAG review for similar options at #744 which was marked as satisfied.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

💬 leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify @beaufortfrancois @eladalon1983

@cynthia
Copy link
Member

cynthia commented Jan 23, 2024

Discussed this (w/ @martinthomson @rhiaro and @ylafon) during F2F. We discussed the potential security/privacy implications of this, in particular whether there are ways to steer users in a direction that allows extraction of information and there is low (to zero) risk. We're happy to see this move forward.

@cynthia cynthia added Progress: review complete Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design Review type: later review Progress: propose closing we think it should be closed but are waiting on some feedback or consensus labels Jan 23, 2024
@beaufortfrancois
Copy link
Author

Thank you @cynthia!

@torgo torgo closed this as completed Jan 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Progress: propose closing we think it should be closed but are waiting on some feedback or consensus Progress: review complete Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design Review type: later review Venue: WebRTC WebRTC and media capture
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants