OK to archive/delete this repo?

[foolip]

@jugglinmike can I archive or delete this repo? Which do you prefer?

[jugglinmike]

My preference is to archive it, though we should also confirm with @jgraham since he's used it for testing as well.

[jgraham]

Very happy for it to be archived or deleted. We can create a new repository if we have call to try this kind of thing again.

[foolip]

Alright, I'll archive it, can delete in a few years if we don't like seeing it in a list.

[foolip]

Looks like I didn't archive it. I'd do it now, but @jugglinmike mentioned yesterday that he'd used it for some testing purpose. Is it still OK to archive?

[jugglinmike]

You did archive it, but I re-activated it to experiment with the script which integrates a GitHub project with wpt.live. Since then, I encouraged @zcorpan to use the repository to experiment with the application which analyzes GitHub activity.

Archiving this repository keeps the organization more tidy, but because both of those efforts are still underway, I'd request we keep this repository open for now.

[foolip]

Oh, is that what happened 😀

[foolip]

Since there was a security alert for an old dependency here, I'm going to archive the repo again. It's fine to unarchive it again if needed.