Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ResourceTiming]: Fix incorrect for-loop iteration #30296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2021

Conversation

chromium-wpt-export-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@chromium-wpt-export-bot chromium-wpt-export-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

We were using
for (const [key, value] in Object.entries(thingy))
but that iterates the indices of the array returned by Object.entries

We need to use
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(thingy))
to get (key, value) pairs instead of (index,undefined) pairs.

Bug: 1171767
Change-Id: I81848afe8dc31dced5363476a1367ce353f8a02a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3138594
Reviewed-by: Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Tom McKee <tommckee@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#917636}

Copy link
Collaborator

@wpt-pr-bot wpt-pr-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The review process for this patch is being conducted in the Chromium project.

We were using
  `for (const [key, value] in Object.entries(thingy))`
but that iterates the indices of the array returned by Object.entries

We need to use
  `for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(thingy))`
to get (key, value) pairs instead of (index,`undefined`) pairs.

Bug: 1171767
Change-Id: I81848afe8dc31dced5363476a1367ce353f8a02a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3138594
Reviewed-by: Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Tom McKee <tommckee@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#917636}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants