Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate urlsafe-base64 to be internal to web-push #786

Closed

Conversation

hikarunoryoma
Copy link
Contributor

@hikarunoryoma hikarunoryoma commented Mar 30, 2023

Solves: #785

@hikarunoryoma hikarunoryoma changed the title migrate urlsafe-base64 to be internal to web-push migrate urlsafe-base64 to be internal to web-push #785 Mar 30, 2023
@hikarunoryoma hikarunoryoma changed the title migrate urlsafe-base64 to be internal to web-push #785 migrate urlsafe-base64 to be internal to web-push Mar 30, 2023
package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@marco-c
Copy link
Member

marco-c commented Mar 31, 2023

LGTM, could you rebase?

@hikarunoryoma
Copy link
Contributor Author

hikarunoryoma commented Apr 3, 2023

LGTM, could you rebase?

Done! :)

Let me know if you want me to bump the version number. I was unsure how that is managed

@marco-c
Copy link
Member

marco-c commented Apr 4, 2023

There seems to be one reference left to fix:

> node ./node_modules/eslint/bin/eslint --ignore-path .gitignore '.'


/home/runner/work/web-push/web-push/test/test-vapid-helper.js
Error:   18:26  error  'urlBase64' is not defined  no-undef

✖ 1 problem (1 error, 0 warnings)

@marco-c
Copy link
Member

marco-c commented Apr 5, 2023

Unfortunately it looks like the tests are failing

@hikarunoryoma
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, I'll look to investigate this weekend and actually have JVM and run these test locally on my machine

@marco-c
Copy link
Member

marco-c commented May 22, 2023

@hikarunoryoma still planning on working on this?

@marco-c marco-c removed their request for review May 22, 2023 16:20
@haouarihk
Copy link
Contributor

when is this gonna get merged.

Thanks for the hard work

@marco-c
Copy link
Member

marco-c commented Jun 10, 2023

when is this gonna get merged.

Thanks for the hard work

There are some failing tests, they need to be fixed first before this can be merged.

@haouarihk haouarihk mentioned this pull request Jun 10, 2023
@haouarihk
Copy link
Contributor

haouarihk commented Jun 10, 2023

i fixed the issue with decode
@hikarunoryoma
#813

@haouarihk haouarihk mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2023
@marco-c
Copy link
Member

marco-c commented Jun 11, 2023

Merged in #813, thank you!

@marco-c marco-c closed this Jun 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants