-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial baseline: Merge contents of master onto develop for the 3.6.* release #719
Conversation
…rray was converted to List but contained items remained unchanged. All tests pass
Added company using web3j to the Readme
added a project that is built using web3j
Testrpc filter fix
add RlpDecoder
added overload to allow signing without hashing message
Added reward action to trace
Add TransactionReceipt.toString() and Log.toString()
…class from examples
…fixes the previous PR #275
Improve quick start documentation. remove confusing InfuraHttpClient …
fix #364 ShipIt contract name
implementation of ENS Reverse name resolution
Moved convertToNative to Contract class
major version bump
Fixes the Log addition to contract events
Do not generate methods for constant functions that return void
modify rawTransaction decode.
Added mnemonic validation method, entropy generation method.
Add method to get Rinkeby keystore directory
Trustless tx hash computation
2. Regenerated Solidity smart contract wrappers in codegen module.
Fix bug in RlpString.asBigInteger
#666 Added missing hash field.
Added WebSocketClient constructor to allow access to headers
Added Apache Camel to the web3j using projects list
Add codeowners and pull request template
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #719 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage ? 77.12%
Complexity ? 1795
==========================================
Files ? 239
Lines ? 6667
Branches ? 996
==========================================
Hits ? 5142
Misses ? 1275
Partials ? 250
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy with this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved
What does this PR do?
develop and master have diverged, we need to pull all the changes made on master (assuming that's where the last release was cut from) onto develop so that development can commence on 3.6
Where should the reviewer start?
Please take a look at the file diffs and assess, unfortunately I don't have too much context here to say much.
Why is it needed?
To baseline the develop branch ahead of the next 3.6 release