Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I am not aware of a similar alternative. I have the following questions:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
sure
…On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 3:49 PM Christian Bromann ***@***.***> wrote:
So, migrating all these tests to wdio with for-Each and eliminating
data-providers (manually changing the code ) is tedious.
We have a codemod <https://github.com/webdriverio/codemod> project that
allows you to modify this code at a higher scale. If you raise a PR there
for this use case, I am happy to merge and release it.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12053 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A662LSZTL2HP23DJCYLFXG3YPLL5LAVCNFSM6AAAAABCCKLKZCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4DCOBVHA2DE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
WDIO/Mocha doesn't support dataproviders, of-course we can use for-Each instead.
Since we have many existing tests with Jasmine data providers, I wanted to check if there is any alternative for Jasmine data providers in WDIO(if we use Mocha). shall we use npm packages like mocha-param? will it work? or any similar efficient libraries to replace Jasmine data providers to migrate my code to WDIO?
Pls let me know your thoughts on it.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions