-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): upgrade jest #1387
Conversation
packages/utils/package.json
Outdated
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ | |||
"@types/got": "9.6.9", | |||
"@types/prettier": "1.19.0", | |||
"@types/yeoman-generator": "3.1.4", | |||
"jest": "25.1.0" | |||
"jest": "25.2.3" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't need it here, we have it at the root already.
Thank you for your pull request! The most important CI builds succeeded, we’ll review the pull request soon. |
Tests seem to be running fine for me, can you yarn and yarn bootstrap after pulling the latest? |
Yes I did a fresh clone, yarn install, yarn bootstrap, yarn build Using Zorin OS 15.2 (based on Ubuntu 18.04), Node v10.13.0 Edit: Just tried it with Node v13.12.0 and tests ran fine. Not sure exactly what versions webpack-cli is trying to support. Anyway, I think upgrading jest here can't hurt. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
fix/chore
Did you add tests for your changes?
no
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
Solves #1386 for me
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information