chore: cleanup verbose flag #1709
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
snitin315
reviewed
Jul 30, 2020
alexander-akait
previously approved these changes
Jul 30, 2020
|
After merge can you investigate other places with validation? |
alexander-akait
previously approved these changes
Jul 30, 2020
Yes will investigate 👍 |
snitin315
previously approved these changes
Jul 30, 2020
snitin315
reviewed
Jul 31, 2020
rishabh3112
previously approved these changes
Jul 31, 2020
addressed |
anshumanv
dismissed stale reviews from rishabh3112, snitin315, and alexander-akait
via
24542bf
snitin315
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2020
rishabh3112
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactoring
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Yes
Summary
remove verbose flag as
--stats verboseis sufficientDoes this PR introduce a breaking change?
Yes
Other information
Ref - #1167