Correct the verb "to need" for the singular form "he", "she" & "it": lacking the "s" at "it needs"

[patacra]

Hi,

I know that it has nothing to do with coding and the way this powerful bundler works, but I was just reading the comments in some of my bundled JS files and noticed that the verb "to need" was often missing a "s" for the singular form "he needs" or "it needs to ...".

Typical example: "This entry need to be wrapped in an IIFE because it need to be in strict mode."

Conjugation of the verb "to need": https://www.theconjugator.com/english/verb/to+need.html

I effectively notice that some online dictionaries do not detect the mistake if the subject isn't the word "he", "she" or "it".
So "This salad needs to be washed before eating it" would be correct, but if you remove the "s", some dictionaries won't necessarily see the mistake. Or perhaps I'm totally wrong, and some new English rules allow removing the "s" in some situations?

[webpack-bot]

For maintainers only:

• This needs to be documented (issue in webpack/webpack.js.org will be filed when merged)
• This needs to be backported to webpack 4 (issue will be created when merged)

[linux-foundation-easycla]

• ✅ login: patacra / name: Patrick Janser (b03cf40)
• ❌ The email address for the commit (ce04387) is not linked to the GitHub account, preventing the EasyCLA check. Consult this Help Article and GitHub Help to resolve. (To view the commit's email address, add .patch at the end of this PR page's URL.) For further assistance with EasyCLA, please submit a support request ticket.

[alexander-akait]

Please accept CLA, thank you

[webpack-bot]

Hi @patacra.

Just a little hint from a friendly bot about the best practice when submitting pull requests:

Don't submit pull request from your own main branch. It's recommended to create a feature branch for the PR.

You don't have to change it for this PR, just make sure to follow this hint the next time you submit a PR.

[patacra]

Please accept CLA, thank you

Thanks @alexander-akait for the suggestion, but I unfortunately didn't manage to get it done. I signed both PDFs, by also creating the cadwork company (my employer), even if this pull request has nothing to do with my employer.

But nevermind, this correction was just a suggestion, as it's just an English error and not a bug at all.