Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ES6 refactoring in DependenciesBlock and Module #4632

Merged

Conversation

smelukov
Copy link
Member

@smelukov smelukov commented Apr 3, 2017

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Refactoring of Webpack Core

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Summary

More ES6 code in Webpack Core (DependenciesBlock and Module)

Inspired #4099

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

@smelukov
Copy link
Member Author

smelukov commented Apr 3, 2017

I did not add/change any code logic, but @webpack-bot tells me It looks like this Pull Request doesn't include enough test cases.
How can it be? о_О

@michael-ciniawsky
Copy link
Member

@smelukov This message is based on Code Coverage :) (-0.05%)

@webpack-bot
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like this Pull Request doesn't include enough test cases.

@smelukov Please add more test cases.

See test readme for details how to write test cases.

@webpack-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The minimum test ratio has been reached. Thanks!

@webpack-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The most important CI builds succeeded. Great work so far.

@sokra
Copy link
Member

sokra commented Apr 4, 2017

The Code Coverage for the code you refactored was low before, so if you touch it codecov reports also low coverage for your PR. For the ES6 refactoring PRs that's fine for me. But thanks for adding test cases 😄. Bot seem to have a positive effect 🎉.

@sokra sokra merged commit 050f5f1 into webpack:master Apr 4, 2017
@sokra
Copy link
Member

sokra commented Apr 4, 2017

Thanks

@smelukov smelukov deleted the refactor-depenpecies-block-and-module branch April 4, 2017 08:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants