Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatic free port usage in tests #193

Closed
eskatos opened this issue Dec 14, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Automatic free port usage in tests #193

eskatos opened this issue Dec 14, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@eskatos
Copy link
Contributor

eskatos commented Dec 14, 2014

Allow tests to be run in parallel and while a devshell is running.

@eskatos
Copy link
Contributor Author

eskatos commented Dec 14, 2014

On 21/10/2014 10:58, @eskatos wrote:

Hum, this should be feasible except for the existing rest-assured based tests that will fail.

The port and baseURL used by rest-assured tests are set in static variables (See WervalTestHelper.java).

Either request/contribute to rest-assured to allow such a scenario (unsure about their willingness to merge nasty ThreadLocals), or find a way to provide rest-assured support.

@eskatos
Copy link
Contributor Author

eskatos commented Dec 15, 2014

@eskatos
Copy link
Contributor Author

eskatos commented Jan 8, 2015

Running rest-assured tests in parallel is not possible, see the rest-assured issue.

@eskatos
Copy link
Contributor Author

eskatos commented Jan 10, 2015

Implementation will reuse the configuration override mechanism introduced in #205

@eskatos eskatos self-assigned this Jan 10, 2015
@eskatos eskatos modified the milestones: 0.6, 1.0 Jan 10, 2015
eskatos added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2015
@eskatos
Copy link
Contributor Author

eskatos commented Jan 10, 2015

Tests can now be rolled while development mode is running.

@eskatos eskatos closed this as completed Jan 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant