-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 290
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Comment out query/queryAll/Elements for now
The multiple notes pointing out the issues that needed to be resolved before they can be implemented were not sufficient to avoid confusing folks.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
34 additions
and
89 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
10b6cf1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@annevk is there any place to read discuss about this or watch future and progress of this new collection?
10b6cf1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ArkadiuszMichalski there's been some discussion on the www-dom mailing list and maybe public-webapps in the past. Not a whole lot though. But the whole thing depends on proper subclassing support in IDL.
10b6cf1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@annevk This is related bug for that functionality https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20020 ?
10b6cf1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes.
10b6cf1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From developers point of view, nobody I could talk with was confused and everyone was waiting for this native. My dpm4 poly also has offered this for years now and never had issues filed. Which "folk" was confused and why are you ruling out developer friendly APIs due IDL problems?
10b6cf1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dom4
10b6cf1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WebReflection several implementers as well as developers. I'm not ruling out this API, I'm simply waiting for it to become feasible. Browsers don't have sufficient subclassing support yet. And it's even less likely to see a native implementation soonish if there's no IDL support.